NRSG 311 Unit 3 Discussion
NRSG 311 Unit 3 Discussion
NRSG 311 Unit 3 Discussion
Assignment Description
Primary Discussion Response is due by Thursday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Saturday (11:59:59pm Central).
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 250 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. You are required to use 1 scholarly resource in addition to your textbook. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas:
You, your nursing manager, and your peers are looking for reliable Web sites to help educate your patients and staff. Complete the following:
- Decide whether you want to research sites for patients or staff education.
- Choose 1 topic about which you want to educate your patients or staff.
- Identify and cite 3–4 Web sites that have relevant information for your patients or staff.
- For each Web site you identified, provide a 2–3-sentence evaluation of each of the following:
- Its main purpose
- Its credibility (who created the site)
- Reliability (peer-reviewed or contributed by experts)
- Quality
- Timeliness of information (its currency)
- How would you suggest sharing the information with your selected group? Why?
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NRSG 311 Unit 3 Discussion:
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NRSG 311 Unit 3 Discussion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:
- Do you agree with the evaluations of others about the Web sites that they found? Why or why not?
- Which are the least helpful sites that someone else identified, and why?
NRSG 311 Unit 3 Discussion Rubric
The Discussion Board Grading Rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the discussion. This Discussion Board Grading Rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component of the discussion. It’s the roadmap that can help lead your discussion. Discussion Board Grading Rubric
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
| Discussion Board Rubric | |||
| Expectation | Weight | % Score Earned | Comments |
| Support From Literature: Support from current literature (less than 5 years old) is present and includes a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation and matching reference for each topic. | 20% | 20% | |
| Application of Course Knowledge: Post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from healthcare field. | 30% | 30% | |
| Organization: Post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to discussion topic. | 20% | 20% | |
| Interactive Dialogue: Responds substantively to two posts from student peers that are topic-related. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion. | 20% | 20% | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA: APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate or with no errors. | 10% | 10% | |
| Total Percentage | 100% | 100% | |
| Possible Points | 50 | ||
| Points Earned | 50 | ||
