Research Literature In Health Psychology PSY 102

Research Literature In Health Psychology PSY 102

Research literature in Health Psychology: PSY 102

1. Research Topic, Projected Value, Documentation Style
2. The research topic I have chosen is substance abuse and intimate partner violence. The research topic is important to the social psychology class that I am undertaking and writing a research paper is one of the requirements. The value of substance abuse and spousal abuse especially when one is in an intimate relationship has several values. Ana analysis of substance abuse in relation to intimate partner violence is important as it will allow us to determine the role that it plays. Indeed, the topic interests me as an individual since I know a couple of people who have suffered intimate partner violence. In addition, the news cycle has always been awash with reports about intimate partner violence since I was young and as such, it has always piqued my interest. Thus, by analyzing the relationship between substance abuse and intimate partner relationship, one can understand the interplay of factors related to the presence of this situation in the society. In addition, the study is hoped to reveal whether substance abuse can be used as a risk marker for intimate partner violence. Further, the study will strive to explain whether an association exists between substance abuse and intimate partner violence. Also, examining the phenomenon will help determine whether the results can be applied to practice and even future research.
3. The topic that I have chosen is important to the readers and myself as it addresses an important societal matter that has caused deaths in some instances. At a personal level, I have learnt about the matter as a curious and interested party but doing it as a college-level research is going to increase my knowledge of the same even further. The research is going to equip me with in-depth information about the matter that I can use to devise appropriate interventions. In addition, previous research has been conducted on the matter and the fact that I am currently looking to study the matter means that I can draw from the same and consequently make important deductions. Indeed, using the research, it is going to be possible for me to meet the requirements of the present course.
4. In order to accomplish the present paper, I am going to use the American Psychological Association (APA) documentation style. APA is particularly applicable in behavioral sciences and the topic that I have chosen falls under this purview. In the present study, the date of particular studies that will be employed herein is more significant than the page number. Given that I am going to be dealing with a societal issue and one that directly affects the population, studies that have been done within the last 5-7 years are going to form the foundation of my research.
5. Leading Research Question and Hypothesis
6. In this research, the leading research question that I propose to examine is: “Can substance abuse be utilized as a risk marker for intimate partner violence?”
7. My working hypothesis for the present research is that substance abuse can be used as a marker for intimate partner violence since there is an association between the two.

III. Research Strategy

1. What aspects of the research do I need to establish?

Is substance abuse a risk marker for IPV?

Does evidence exist that the above is true?

What are the possible explanations for the correlation between IPV and substance abuse?

What is the implication of the above association for both theory and practice?

Annotated Bibliography

Crane, C., Oberleitner, L., Devine, S., & Easton, C. (2014). Substance use disorders and intimate partner violence perpetration among male and female offenders. Psychol Violence Journal, 4(3), 322-333.

In the above study, Crane, Orbeleitner, Devine and Easton (2014) sought to examine the direct correlations between individuals and intimate partner violence from a sample of individuals who concurrently used alcohol, cannabis cocaine, and opioids. Moreover, they also sought to assess the existing gender variations from the above associations using a huge forensic sample that encompassed both male and female offenders. The study is important to my study as it revealed that an association exists between alcohol abuse and intimate partner violence. Further, the study went further and examined the specific types of substances that promote intimate partner violence, which will play a crucial role in the present research. Similarly, the study examined the gender factor in intimate partner violence as a result of substance abuse, which will help the research make conclusions regarding which gender is more susceptible to IPV due to substance abuse.

Wu, E., El-Bassel, N., McVinney, L. D., Hess, L., Fopeano, M. V., Hwang, H. G., … Mansergh, G. (2015). The Association Between Substance Use and Intimate Partner Violence Within Black Male Same-Sex Relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(5), 762–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514536277

In this study, Wu et al. (2014) sought to understand the relationship between substance abuse as well as intimate partner relationship among male who have sex with fellow men within the black community. The study was influenced by the paucity of research regarding the above association amongst same-sex married men yet heterosexual relationships have received significant attention from the literature. Indeed, the researchers used a data set containing 74 individuals who had met the inclusion criterion for the study. The study revealed that at least a third of the sample population experienced intimate partner violence at some point in their current relationship whereas 24 of them experienced and perpetrated the same. Further, the research posited that heavy drinking and methamphetamine were responsible for both experiencing and perpetrating IPV amongst the population. Crack cocaine was also related to both perpetrating and experiencing intimate partner violence. Therefore, as regards my research proposal, the study will aid in establishing that an association exists between substance abuse and intimate partner violence. Further, it will also support the premise that abusing drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine influences both perpetration and experiencing of the same.

Low, S., Tiberio, S. S., Shortt, J. W., Capaldi, D. M., & Eddy, J. M. (2017). Associations of couples’ intimate partner violence in young adulthood and substance use: A dyadic approach. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 120-127.

The study by Low et al. (2017) analyzed the association between IPV in young adults and its association with substance abuse. According to the authors, a clear clarity does not exist in literature regarding this association. Consequently, determining the nature of the association based on strengths becomes difficult. Thus, using a dyadic perspective, the study examine the correlation between alcohol and marijuana use and the types of IPV that they cause. The study hypothesized that both male and female partners’ polysubstance use will predispose them to perpetrating IPV while abstinence will protect them from perpetrating the same. The researchers concluded that substance abuse caused IPV in both men and women. That Low et al. (2017) used dyadic methodology to determine the association between polysubstance use and IPV in young adults, the study can support the present research since the author is looking to make a similar determination. The study will provide evidence that indeed substance abuse is a risk marker for IPV and that the preciseness of the same can be used to formulate practice interventions.

Leone, R. M., Crane, C. A., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2016). Problematic drinking, impulsivity, and physical IPV perpetration: A dyadic analysis. Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 356–366. doi:10.1037/adb0000159.

Leone, Crane, Parrott, and Eckhardt (2016) also sort to establish the association between problematic drinking and the perpetration of physical IPV. Using a total sample of 578 heavy drinking heterosexual couples, the researchers ensured that the characteristics of each partner is taken into account during the study. Thus, in their study, they ensured to assess heterosexual couples who were both heavy drinkers in order to determine their predisposing to physical IPV as a consequence. Applying several Actor Partner Interdependence Model, the study showed that a relationship exists between actor problematic drinking and physical violence on their intimate partners. Thus, the study will help my research as it has shown the significance of using dyadic model to examine this relationship. Through the application of the model, my research will be able to reveal specific facets of IPV among couples, something that present research has failed to accomplish.

Subramani, O. S., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2017). Problematic Drinking Mediates the Association Between Urgency and Intimate Partner Aggression During Acute Intoxication. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 41(9), 1602–1611. doi:10.1111/acer.13437

 

Most studies examining the subject do so by looking at the association between substance abuse and IPV. However, Subraini, Parrot, and Eckhardt (2017) decided to examine the mediative factors that connect problematic drinking and IPV among 249 heavy drinkers in the United States. The study adopted a moderated-mediational model wherein impulsivity dimensions variedly predicted IPV due to problematic drinking. Questionnaires were given to the participants and they had to consume alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks in order to complete a task based on shock-based aggression. According to the study, intoxicated partners demonstrated an aggressive intimate partner violence upon undertaking problematic drinking. Thus, the study revealed that the ability to act rashly due to problematic drinking increases the chances of intimate partner violence occurring amongst couples. Thus, unlike other studies, the present one considered the mediative factors of problematic drinking and how they influence IPV. Thus, during the formulation of interventions for the issue, the current author will consider them in order to formulate a targeted therapy.

References

Crane, C., Oberleitner, L., Devine, S., & Easton, C. (2014). Substance use disorders and intimate partner violence perpetration among male and female offenders. Psychol Violence Journal, 4(3), 322-333. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801342/

Leone, R. M., Crane, C. A., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2016). Problematic drinking, impulsivity, and physical IPV perpetration: A dyadic analysis. Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 356–366. doi:10.1037/adb0000159. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877202/

Low, S., Tiberio, S. S., Shortt, J. W., Capaldi, D. M., & Eddy, J. M. (2017). Associations of couples’ intimate partner violence in young adulthood and substance use: A dyadic approach. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 120-127. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297658651_Associations_of_Couples%27_Intimate_Partner_Violence_in_Young_Adulthood_and_Substance_Use_A_Dyadic_Approach

Subramani, O. S., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2017). Problematic Drinking Mediates the Association Between Urgency and Intimate Partner Aggression During Acute Intoxication. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 41(9), 1602–1611. doi:10.1111/acer.13437- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581204/

Wu, E., El-Bassel, N., McVinney, L. D., Hess, L., Fopeano, M. V., Hwang, H. G., … Mansergh, G. (2015). The Association Between Substance Use and Intimate Partner Violence Within Black Male Same-Sex Relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(5), 762–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514536277

Details

Research Project Directions

The purpose of this assignment is to examine the research literature in Health Psychology and how this is applied to chronic health issues.

Choose a chronic health issue individuals experience (e.g. diabetes, fibromyalgia, asthma, addiction) that is often seen by health psychologists. MY CHOICE PARKINSON’S DISEASE.

Write a 1,250-1,500-word essay that addresses the following:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Research literature in Health Psychology: PSY 102

Utilize a minimum of six outside scholarly sources (peer-reviewed journal articles obtained from the GCU library). Certain websites (e.g. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Psychological Association) may be used in addition to the six peer-reviewed journal articles.

Prepare this Research literature in Health Psychology: PSY 102 assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

PSY 102 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 1

Define psychology. How did psychology come into existence? From your readings, what are some of the contributions that psychology has produced for humanity?

PSY 102 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 2

What is the relationship between the brain and behavior? What are some examples that might illustrate this?

Integrative reviews and synthesis have never been more necessary.

The area of psychology is exploding with research. 

There are more researchers and investigators than ever before, as well as published publications and journals. 

The Web of Science database already has over 9000 journals, according to Thomson Reuters, and the number is growing (Testa, 2010). 

Electronic databases and digital holdings for journals such as Web of Science and Medline have revolutionized research to a considerable extent, and the process of finding articles has never been simpler or more efficient. 

The sheer magnitude of the psychology canon, on the other hand, has ironically produced new challenges. 

Scholars face a great task in distilling, synthesising, and understanding such a massive corpus of literature, especially those seeking a concise, succinct summary of a particular field or area. 

As a result, researchers and academics are increasingly turning to narrative and empirical reviews for an up-to-date compendium of research on their chosen topic. 

Furthermore, the need for research evidence syntheses in key areas has arisen as a result of the acknowledgment of the relevance of an evidence-base in the creation of policy and practice in the realm of health and medicine (Kelly & Abraham, 2009). 

Such summaries have been and will continue to be used to guide policy practice in the health sector (e.g., Cochrane database of systematic reviews). 

Finally, the use of tools such as meta-analyses and systematic reviews to undertake empirical syntheses of research evidence has aided in the production of evidence-based summaries of the state of the literature in health psychology (Hagger, 2006). 

These synthesis are increasingly ‘in demand’ and widely referenced in the area, especially when combined with more classic integrative narrative reviews.

The Health Psychology Review (HPR) is a vital forum for health psychologists.

Health Psychology Review (HPR) is an important arena for the dissemination of high-quality empirical and narrative evaluations of the literature because of this demand. 

For numerous reasons, I find myself at the helm of a journal with enormous potential for making a lasting contribution to the fields of health psychology and behavioural medicine. 

First and foremost, the diary is unlike any other. 

It is the only review publication of its kind in the area, and it is explicitly positioned as an essential reference for all psychologists seeking articles that summarize the state of the research in the broad subject of psychology applied to health. 

Second, the journal has a lot of potential for citations and to be a valuable resource for health psychology researchers, students, and practitioners. 

Third, it will be a valuable source of original thought in which health psychology theories and hypotheses can be presented, argued, updated, and polished. 

This will be a crucial step before conducting further empirical and formative research to confirm theoretical developments. 

As a result, HPR is a cornerstone publication that will summarize the state of the health psychology literature, catalyze future research, and produce new, innovative thinking that will propel the discipline forward.

In the three years since HPR’s start as a reader and contributor, what has struck me is the quality, rigor, and attention to detail of its content. 

Joop van der Pligt, the journal’s first editor, and his team of Associate Editors, as well as the Editorial Board, have done an outstanding job building the journal, and it is quickly becoming recognized as an essential platform for theoretical and empirical reviews. 

I’d like to thank the European Health Psychology Society (EHPS) and the Taylor and Francis editorial team for their continuous support. 

HPR has established itself as a worthy partner to Psychology and Health, one of the premier empirical journals in the field, thanks to the editorial team’s efforts, and the two journals combined make up the EHPS’s strong portfolio of titles. 

The exiting staff deserves to be congratulated and thanked for their efforts. 

As the new editor, I am grateful for the journal’s success thus far, and I am honored to be named to this position and affiliated with such a remarkable publication. 

However, I am aware that there is always opportunity for development, and I accept and look forward to the challenges that lie ahead.

Three goals summarize my vision for the future of this important journal. 

First and foremost, the journal’s material must be of high quality. 

I am lucky to be joined by a very great team of Associate Editors, so I am already one step ahead in terms of achieving my goal. 

I am ecstatic to announce that I will have the backing of the following distinguished academics in my role as Editor: 

Noel Brewer (University of North Carolina, USA), Linda Cameron (University of Auckland, New Zealand), Denise de Ridder (Utrecht University, Netherlands), Antonia Lyons (Waikato University, New Zealand), and Falko Sniehotta (University of North Carolina, USA) (University of Aberdeen, UK). 

It’s an honor to work with such a talented group, and I can rest easy knowing that my submissions will be of the highest quality under their supervision. 

Second, I hope to draw new, unique papers to the journal that will be of interest to the readership and address both fundamental and contemporary concerns in health psychology and behavioral medicine. 

I believe that the journal should play an active and forward-thinking role in the advancement of knowledge. 

To that purpose, the editorial team and I will create new formats that complement traditional full-length articles and actively encourage authors to submit contributions in them. 

Commentaries and papers on methodological and practice issues will be included. 

Third, the journal is already having an impact, and I’d like to expand it. 

This is evident not only in terms of the quality and creativity of the contributions published thus far, but also in terms of key indicators such as the number of citations of HPR articles, electronic article downloads, and website visitors. 

However, there is a clear need to properly quantify this influence, and one of my goals as Editor is to create the first impact factor for HPR.

The Research Review’s Future

The HPR editorial team is dedicated to publishing high-quality integrative reviews that cross disciplines, contribute to theory development, and further our understanding of health psychology. 

To that end, we want to publish reviews that not only summarize the current state of knowledge, but also address basic concerns about the mechanisms and processes that underpin health and sickness behavior and consequences. 

Social cognition and health behavior, interventions and trials, psychological elements of sickness, and health care delivery mechanisms are all examples of separate categories in health psychology research. 

Recent submissions to the journal, on the other hand, have gone beyond these traditional divisions, developing theories that combine ideas from several fields important to health-related behavior and outcomes. 

The impact of explicit and implicit processes (Aarts, 2007; Hofmann, Friese, & Wiers, 2008), the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions and their design (Abraham & Graham-Rowe, 2009; Annesi, Marti, & Stice, 2010; Floyd & Moyer, 2010; van Stralen, De Vries, Mudde, Bolman, & Lechner, 2009), the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions and their design (Abraham (Beck, 2008). 

The fact that these studies include multiple aspects of health psychology shows that creative thinking and theory building do not simply fit into established categories, and we promote integrative methods.

Management of long-term conditions (Plews, 2005), complex interventions (Campbell et al., 2000), digital and online technologies (Kraft & Yardley, 2009), efficacy and content of specific behavior change techniques and components (Michie, Rothman, & Sheeran, 2007), cross-cultural influences on health behavior (Rüdell & Diefenbach, 2008), individual differences as a factor in health behavior (Rüdell & Diefenbach, 2008), (Hagger, Wood, Stiff, & Chatzisarantis, 2009; Hall & Fong, 2007; Van Damme, Crombez, Goubert, & Eccleston, 2009). 

I would also urge reviews that create concepts based on convergent data from multiple methodologies to be submitted. 

In medicine, for example, the randomized controlled trial dominates the literature, and in health psychology, it is a critical design for evaluating behavior change interventions and the efficacy of psychologically informed studies (Sibbald & Roland, 1998). 

However, this should be supplemented with data from other sources, such as survey, interview, archive, and focus group data, as well as qualitative and quantitative analysis (Tones, 2000). 

Systematic reviews should strive to be more inclusive in their examination and integration of these different evidence sources in order to form clear findings about the evidence base for a given literature, as well as provide a justification and proposals for future research endeavors.

Conclusion

I welcome readers and researchers to contribute their finest research syntheses, in the form of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and new ideas, in the form of narrative reviews and comments, to HPR on behalf of the Associate Editors and Editorial Board. 

In the next years, the journal will continue to grow and expand, and I believe it will become a focal point in the area, promoting original scholarship, broadly summarizing and synthesising the field’s research, and providing novel new theories that will generate more empirical inquiry. 

I want HPR to be the “go-to” magazine for academics looking for narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews that will help them learn and develop in their fields. 

I am convinced that the journal will establish itself as the main review publication in the area, with a high impact, and will be regarded as the Psychological Bulletin of the health psychology discipline in the coming years.