NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care
NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System
NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System
Mar 14-20, 2022
Max Points:213
Objectives:
- Discuss the influence of the IOM Report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” on the nursing profession.
- Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions in advancing the goals of IOM Report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” for nursing.
- Explain how nursing advocates overcome barriers to advancement.
Assessments
Published
Assessment Description
Take a moment to explore your new classroom and introduce yourself to your fellow classmates. What are you excited about learning? What do you think will be most challenging?
The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health
Read “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” located on the National Academies of
Sciences Engineering Medicine website, as needed to complete your assignment.
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12956/the-future-of-nursing-leading-change-advancing-health
Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition
Explore the Campaign for Action website.
The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations
Read “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations,” located on the
National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine website.
https://www.nap.edu/read/12956/chapter/2
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System
NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System
Interprofessional collaboration is a process involving jointly advantageous active participation
between independent professionals in which each member of the health care team has knowledge
and skills that underwrite to the care provided and their relationships are governed by negotiated
shared norms and visions (Melkamu et al., 2020). Teamwork and collaboration are competencies
expected of healthcare professionals and refer to functioning effectively within nursing and
interprofessional teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision
making to achieve quality patient care (Masters, 2017). Collaboration requires communication
among team members involved where every professional take part of their clinical expertise, that
is within their scope of practice. Interdisciplinary team conference can be considered
interprofessional collaboration. The more eyes laid on the patient, the more chances of reducing, if
not eliminate errors. All members of the interprofessional healthcare team must combine their
skills knowledge, and resources to improve outcomes, and nurses and physicians must modify
their traditional roles and work more collaboratively as colleagues (Masters, 2017).
The trend that is being helpful nowadays is the emergence of electronic medical record (EMR).
With paperless charting, communication is now accessible electronically. A good example is the
platform (data software) used by big healthcare systems such as Ascension (formerly Amita) and
Duly Health (formerly Dupage Medical Group) in Illinois. These two systems can now view each
other’s chartings provided the patient consented on merging data. This makes it easier for medical
providers provide continuity of care without waiting for fax or hard copy of diagnostics or lab
results as well as progress notes.
Eneyew Melkamu, Solomon Woldemariam, & Abera Haftu. (2020). Inter-professional collaboration
of nurses and midwives with physicians and associated factors in Jimma University specialized
teaching hospital, Jimma, south West Ethiopia, 2019: cross sectional study. BMC Nursing, 19(1),
1–9. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00426-w
Masters, K., (2017). Role development in professional nursing. Jones and Bartlett Learning
GP
Gregory Pryor
replied toJoseph Lagman
Aug 4, 2022, 9:10 AM
Read
Replies to Joseph Lagman
Hello Joseph,
I agree with your post. What healthcare professionals must first realize is that each profession
has an area of expertise and respect of the specialty is of the utmost importance. There or
medical issues, nursing issues, and pharmaceutical issues. Collaboration of the professions
allows the team to come together and resolve issues. Take for example a medication issue. It
could lie within how the medication was transcribed by the physician, or how the medication is
being administered by the nurse, or the preparation and delivery of the medication to the
nursing unit(Irajpour et al.,2019). I can recall when medications were coming to the nursing h if
and needed to be reconstituted at the time of delivery. Some nurses were not reconstituting
the medication because they missed the inservice and was failing to deliver the dose. With the
next dose due the nurse would discover the bag of medicine not reconstituted. Discovery of a
medication that could cause great harm to a patient, especially if the following nurse did not
follow up on the missing dose. The third problem lie in that the reconstituted medication was
not dissolved in the amount of fluid the order was written. If all three professions were
collaborating together the medication issue could have been avoided or discovered before the
patient condition deteriorated to sepsis.
Reference
Irajpour, A., Farzi, S., Saghaei, M., & Ravaghi, H. (2019). Effect of interprofessional education
of medication safety program on the medication error of physicians and nurses in the intensive
care units. Journal of Education and Health Promotion.
Excellent
Point range: 90–100
Good
Point range: 80–89
Fair
Point range: 70–79
Poor
Point range: 0–69
Introduction to the case (1
page)
Briefly explain and summarize
the case for this Assignment.
Be sure to include the specific
patient factors that may impact
your decision making when
prescribing medication for this
patient.
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
The response accurately, clearly,
and fully summarizes in detail the
case for the Assignment.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
specific patient factors that
impact decision making when
prescribing medication for this
patient.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
The response accurately
summarizes the case for the
Assignment.
The response accurately explains
the specific patient factors that
impact decision making with
prescribing medication for this
patient.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
select?
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
- Why did you not select the
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.
Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
select?
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
- Why did you not select the
other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.
Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
select?
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
- Why did you not select the
other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.
Conclusion (1 page)
recommendations on the
treatment options you selected
for this patient. Be sure to
justify your recommendations
and support your response
with clinically relevant and
patient-specific resources,
including the primary literature.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and
clearly summarizes in detail the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately and
clearly explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
recommendations provided.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response accurately
summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately explains
a justification for the
recommendation provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that support the
recommendations provided.
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
recommendations provided.
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
recommendations provided, or is
missing.
Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points
that support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are carefully
focused—neither long and
rambling nor short and lacking
substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction are
provided that delineate all
required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive
purpose statement, introduction,
and conclusion are provided that
delineate all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 80% of the
time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment are
stated, yet they are brief and not
descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment is
vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose statement,
introduction, or conclusion were
provided.
NRS 440 Topic 1 Assignment The Future of Nursing in an Evolving Health Care System
Written Expression and
Formatting – English writing
standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors
that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.
Written Expression and
Formatting – The paper follows
correct APA format for title
page, headings, font,
spacing, margins, indentations,
page numbers, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and reference
list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no
errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA
format errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6630_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
