NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Recent
NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Recent
NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Recent
Policymaker Electronic Presentation
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3).
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)
(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10)
(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10)
Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points:275 points
Assignment Criteria for Presentation
1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.
2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.
4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.
6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.
Preparing the Presentation
After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.
Category Points % Description
Visit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation)
Policymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
Reflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.
Future Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting/presentation and their importance to nursing.
Conclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.
APA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.
Presentation/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.
Total 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Assignment Criteria Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance
Possible Points = 245 Points
Visit Description 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation) Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.
Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.
Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy..
Policymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.
Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.
Reflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.
Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.
Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.
There is no reflection on process.
Future Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 Points
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing.
Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no Discussion of importance to nursing.
Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.
Conclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 Points
Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.
Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.
Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.
Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.
Content Subtotal _____of 245 points
Possible Points = 30 Points
APA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.
There are 2-3 APA format errors.
There are 4-6 APA format errors.
There are 6-7 APA format errors.
Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing
Presentation/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.
Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.
Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.
Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.
Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.
Format Subtotal _____of 30 points
Total Points _____of 275 points
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation Recent
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Also Read: DQ: RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.