It is clear that “solitary negative reactions or unjustified suggestions for change have the potential to dissipate discourse” (howard, barrett, & frick, 2010, p. 103). however, anonymity may give lea

It is clear that “solitary negative reactions or unjustified suggestions for change have the potential to dissipate discourse” (howard, barrett, & frick, 2010, p. 103). however, anonymity may give learners a context in which they can try providing solutions that are more thoroughly supported by an accompanying rational (howard, barrett, & frick, 2010). clearly, the positive and negative consequences that anonymity has on peer feedback must be considered. references: howard,
c.
d., barrett,
a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89-112.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply