Social Security And The Economic Reality Of Aging Adults • Online Nursing Essays
Value: 100 points
Due: Day 7
Instructions
Journal writing provides a nonthreatening way to explore different thoughts, ideas, and topics without being concerned about audience presentation. The process of writing can facilitate reflection and allow you to express your feelings regarding your educational experiences, as well as clarify your thinking.
Accomplish the following in your journal entry:

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HP 626 Week 5 Journal Entry: Social Security and the Economic Reality of Aging Adults done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
- Discuss how epidemiological and ethical standpoints interact to create specific problems that lead to challenges stemming from income levels of older adults.
- Explain how minority aging adults are more financially disadvantaged compared to non-minority aging groups.
- Identify possible solutions as an aging service provider to create financial security among aging adults, such as a public policy forcing retirement savings in addition to Social Security.
- Describe the costs and benefits of your proposal from both the individual’s and the society’s perspective.
- State whether you believe enforced savings in addition to Social Security is ethical, and explain why.
Your journal entry should be 250 to 400 words long. No outside research is expected and, therefore, no references are needed.
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.
Posting Your Journal Entry:
- Select Start or Edit My Journal Entry.
- Create your journal entry.
- Select Save Changes.
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Needs Improvement | Inadequate | Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Entry Focus and Content | The entire entry is clear, focused and responds to the entire prompt. It contains self-reflection and content that integrates course topics.
60 points |
Most of the entry addresses the prompt. It is clear and focused. There is mention of course topics and self-reflection without integration or clear connection.
53 points |
Some of the entry is focused on the prompt. It is vague and rambling without self-reflection and/or course content.
47 points |
The entry is not focused and does not address the prompt.
41 points |
60 |
| Organization | The entry is organized in a meaningful manner that flows well and is clear to the reader.
15 points |
Most of the entry is organized in a meaningful manner. The writing is mostly clear.
13 points |
Some of the entry is organized in a meaningful manner. The writing is vague, lacks clarity and purpose.
11 points |
The entry is scattered and disorganized.
10 points |
15 |
| Clarity and Style (Spelling, Grammar, and Punctuation) | The entry has very few grammar or spelling errors but they don’t impact readability.
15 points |
The entry has a few spelling and/or grammar issues that slightly impact readability.
13 points |
The entry has several spelling and/or grammar issues that somewhat impact readability.
11 points |
The entry has many spelling and/or grammar issues that greatly impact readability.
10 points |
15 |
| APA Format | Few to no errors in APA formatting, including margins, spacing, pagination, headings, headers, citations, and references according to the specified citation manual.
10 points |
Few to several errors in APA formatting, including margins, spacing, pagination, headings, headers, citations, and references according to the specified citation manual.
8 points |
Several to many errors in APA formatting, including margins, spacing, pagination, headings, headers, citations, and references according to the specified citation manual.
7 points |
Many errors in APA formatting, including margins, spacing, pagination, headings, headers, citations, and references according to the specified citation manual.
6 points |
10 |
| Total Points | 100 | ||||

