IHuman Simulation REGIS • Online Nursing Essays

Sample Answer for NU 665B Week 2 Assignment 1: iHuman Simulation REGIS Included After Question

Gradebook Category: Assignments – iHuman Assignments

Introduction

The iHuman platform is an opportunity for you to interact with a simulated patient and gather data. When working in iHuman, practice as if this were a real patient. For example, the platform allows you to ask many questions when taking a history. In real life, you likely will be limited in time. Practice setting a time limit for yourself and work on being efficient in your clinical interview.

If you require technical support with the iHuman platform, use the iHuman Help Center to contact iHuman Technical Support directly. Technical support refers to a malfunction of the platform; they cannot help with issues involving content! Faculty cannot assist with technical issues.

Instructions

In this assignment, you will review a patient scenario in iHuman. Please see the course announcement for the case assigned this week. Your deliverable for this assignment is a paper based on the iHuman SOAP Note Template (Word).

• Follow the requirements listed in the iHuman SOAP Note Template.
• When your iHuman SOAP Note Template is complete, upload it to this assignment.

All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

To Submit Your Assignment:

1. Select the Add Submissions button.
2. Drag or upload your file to the File Picker.
3. Select Save Changes.

A Sample Answer For the NU 665B Week 2 Assignment 1: iHuman Simulation REGIS Assignment:

Title: NU 665B Week 2 Assignment 1: iHuman Simulation REGIS

Criteria	Exemplary Exceeds Expectations	Advanced Meets Expectations	Intermediate Needs Improvement	Novice Inadequate	Total Points
Subjective – 40%	Determined by iHuman40 points	Determined by iHuman36 points	Determined by iHuman32 points	Determined by iHuman0 points	40
Objective – 25%	Determined by iHuman25 points	Determined by iHuman22 points	Determined by iHuman20 points	Determined by iHuman0 points	25
Objective – 5% (Testing)	Determined by iHuman5 points	Determined by iHuman4 points	Determined by iHuman3 points	Determined by iHuman0 points	5
Assessment–5%	Three differential diagnoses are supported by findings and include worst-case scenario. Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 5 points	Three differential diagnoses include worst-case scenario, but one diagnosis might not be fully supported by findings. Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 3 points	Differential diagnoses may or may not include worst-case scenario, and two differential diagnoses are not supported by findings. Rationale for all differential diagnoses not provided by scholarly resources. 1 points	Fewer than three differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings and do not include worst-case scenario. Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses. 0 points	5
Plan–25%	Comprehensive plan includes all components:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNon-pharmacologic interventionReferralsPatient educationFollow-upAppropriate and current guidelines cited. 25 points	Plan missing one of the identified components:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNon-pharmacologic interventionReferralsPatient educationFollow-upAppropriate and current guidelines cited. 17 points	Plan missing two of the identified components:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNon-pharmacologic interventionReferralsPatient educationFollow-upGuidelines are not current or appropriate for identified problem. 9 points	Plan missing more than three of the identified components:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNon-pharmacologic interventionReferralsPatient educationFollow-upGuidelines for plan not cited. 0 points	25
Total Points					100