DNP 801: PICOT_D Question.

DNP 801: PICOT_D Question.

                                                                       PICOT D Question

                                                                                

                                                            Grand Canyon University

                                                                       DNP: 801A

                                                             Instructor: Dr. Patricia Etheridge

                                                                           3/12/2022

DNP Learner Name_ Carolyn Smith                          Current Course 801A

Submit the Completed Template *See Additional Instructions below for completing the Template on Page 2.

Save file as Carolyn Smith PICOT_D Question. DNP 801 3/8/2022

PICOT-D Question Template
P	Population	Elderly and debilitated patients in a Long-Term-Care Facility
I	Intervention	Preventive Care Bundle
C	Comparison	Routine pressure ulcer prevention
O	Outcome	Reduce the incidence of pressure ulcer
T	Timeline	Within 60 days
D	Data	Electronic Health Record, research databases
What is your licensure?	APRN                                               RN   Is this practice change within the scope of your nursing practice?   YES       No   By submitting this form, I am attesting I have read my state’s Nurse Practice Act, and the project is within the scope of my practice.
PICOT	[P], does a pressure preventive bundle [I], compared to routine pressure injury care [C], reduce the incidence of pressure injury [O], within 60 days? [T].
Problem Statement	It is not known if the implementation of pressure preventive bundle would impact pressure ulcer prevention among elderly and debilitated patients in a long-term-care facility
Purpose Statement	The purpose of this quality improvement project is to determine if the implementation of a Care Bundle Intervention would impact pressure ulcer prevention among   elderly and debilitated patients in a long-term-care facility. The project was piloted over an eight-week period in a suburban Maryland city in a long term care facility.
Original Research articles: List all original research articles that support the intervention (Required) Ensure there is a permalink to the research articles. Attach the articles to the email submission to the PICOT Team Week 8 and all subsequent submissions.	Darvall, J. N., Mesfin, L., & Gorelik, A. (2018). Increasing frequency of critically ill patient turns is associated with a reduction in pressure injuries.             Critical Care and Resuscitation, 20(3), 217-222. https://europepmc.org/article/med/30153784. Pickham, D., Berte, N., Pihulic, M., Valdez, A., Mayer, B., & Desai, M. (2018). Effect of a wearable patient sensor on care delivery for preventing pressure injuries in acutely ill adults: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (LS-HAPI study). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 80, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.012. Tayyib, N., Asiri, M. Y., Danic, S., Sahi, S. L., Lasafin, J., Generale, L. F., … & Reyes, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Skincare Bundle in              Preventing Medical-Device Related Pressure Injuries in Critical Care Units: A Clinical Trial. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 34(2), 75-80. Doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000725184.13678.80

References

Darvall, J. N., Mesfin, L., & Gorelik, A. (2018). Increasing frequency of critically ill patient turns is associated with a reduction in pressure injuries.

            Critical Care and Resuscitation, 20(3), 217-222. https://europepmc.org/article/med/30153784.

Pickham, D., Berte, N., Pihulic, M., Valdez, A., Mayer, B., & Desai, M. (2018). Effect of a wearable patient sensor on care delivery for preventing pressure injuries in acutely ill adults: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (LS-HAPI study). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 80, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.012.

Tayyib, N., Asiri, M. Y., Danic, S., Sahi, S. L., Lasafin, J., Generale, L. F., … & Reyes, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Skincare Bundle in

             Preventing Medical-Device Related Pressure Injuries in Critical Care Units: A Clinical Trial. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 34(2), 75-80. Doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000725184.13678.80

Grading Rubric Accomplished Emerging Unsatisfactory Content Points Range:62.25 (41.50%) – 75 (50.00%) Responds clearly, thoroughly, and effectively to all aspects of the assignment. All content is accurate and/or supported. Points Range:57 (38.00%) – 61.5 (41.00%) Responds adequately to the assignment but may not be thorough. Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 56.25 (37.50%) Does not respond to the assignment. Focus and Detail Points Range:31.125 (20.75%) – 37.5 (25.00%) There is a clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information gathered from scholarly sources. Points Range:28.5 (19.00%) – 30.75 (20.50%) There is a clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by scholarly sources and detailed information. Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 28.125 (18.75%) The topic and main ideas are not clear. Organization Points Range:18.675 (12.45%) – 22.5 (15.00%) The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong. Points Range:17.1 (11.40%) – 18.45 (12.30%) The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included. Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 16.875 (11.25%) There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion. Mechanics and APA Points Range:12.45 (8.30%) – 15 (10.00%) The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free of errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are correctly cited and referenced. Points Range:11.4 (7.60%) – 12.3 (8.20%) The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are correctly cited and referenced. Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 11.25 (7.50%) The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are incorrectly cited and referenced or citations and references are missing.