The Purpose Of This Assignment Is To Create An Educational Program That Supports The Implementation Of Risk Management Strategies In A Health Care Organization

HLT-308V – Educational Program on Risk Management – Part One & Two – Fall Prevention Essay

The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of risk management strategies in a health care organization.

In this assignment, you will develop an outline for an “in?service”?style educational risk management program for employees of a particular health care organization that will then form the basis for a PowerPoint presentation in Topic 5. Select your topic for this educational session from one of the proposed recommendations or changes you suggested in the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards in your chosen risk management plan example.

Create a 500?750-word comprehensive outline that communicates the following about your chosen topic:

1. Introduction: Identify the risk management topic you have chosen to address and why it is important within your health care sector.
2. Rationale: Illustrate how this risk management strategy is lacking within your selected organization’s current risk management plan and explain how its implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards.
3. Support: Provide data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management initiative and demonstrate how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility to provide a safe health care facility and work environment.
4. Implementation: Describe the steps to implement the proposed strategy in your selected health care organization.
5. Challenges: Predict obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk management strategy and propose solutions to navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes.
6. Evaluation: Outline your plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program and how well it meets the organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals.
7. Opportunities: Recommend additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward.

You are required to incorporate all instructor feedback from this assignment into Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two ? Slide Presentation assignment in Topic 5. To save time later in the course, consider addressing any feedback soon after this assignment has been graded and returned to you. It may be helpful to preview the requirements for the Topic 5 assignment to ensure that your outline addresses all required elements for submission of the final presentation.

Risk Management Plan Analysis

Selected Risk Management Plan Summary

The chosen risk management plan is a hospital patient injury management plan. The main goal of any management plan is optimizing future performance, mainly in averting risks.  Risk refers to the likelihood of damage or injury, which results from different susceptibilities. Usually, risks can be eliminated through the use of pre-emptive measures. Typically, the interaction of patients with health systems could pose significant threats to them due to the high demand for services, increased hopes, and time pressure, among other cases. The World Health organization argues that one in ten patients in the developed world is injured while receiving treatment. The degree of injuries associated with hospital stays in the United States is also high (World Health Organization, 2014). Some of the causes of hospital-acquired diseases include adverse drug events, patient falls, and surgical complications, among several other contributors. This plan particularly applies to hospitals and other healthcare organizations that offer patient care. The role of this plan in such settings remains vital in helping to prioritize patient safety while undergoing care. Medical errors have profoundly become a third leading cause of patient injuries today, and therefore, the need for a management plan. Equally, a higher percentage of injuries occur in hospitals and healthcare facilities (Cagliano, Grimaldi, & Rafele, 2011).

Description of Standard Administrative Steps

            The essential administrative steps of a risk management plan in hospitals, as well as other care facilities, include the creation of the context for risk, recognition of hazards, analysis of risks, evaluation of risks, and management of risks. The establishment of the background remains vital in identifying and controlling risks. This step is primarily pertinent in such areas as the intensive care unit, emergency rooms, and operation rooms. These areas offer appropriate settings for risk context. The second step is risk recognition, where care specialists become aware of the various risks that confront patients in the healthcare environment. Here, risks identified get recorded in a tool known as the risk management tool.  The third step entails risk analysis, where professionals attempt to understand identified risks. This step involves several three vital processes, including the level of risk, its underlying costs, and prevailing control measures. The fundamental reason for evaluating risks is attempting to prioritize dangers based on risk analysis and deciding which of these risks require immediate attention.

After designing a control and management plan, the process of monitoring and avoiding future emergence of risks begin. Reviewing and controlling such risks entail incident reporting, hospital audit indicators, staff complaints, patient surveys, as well as satisfaction surveys. Often, as compared to the above-identified plan, risk management in most of the healthcare settings is done by organizations that are well established and conscious of the diversity of risks facing hospitals. These organizations vigorously seek to control risks and are, thus, a step ahead in the fight against care risks. As such, the Total Quality Management (TQM) plan strives for quality of patient care, with superior and pro-active methods of tracking different risks.

Analysis of Agencies and Organizations

            Efforts intended to enhance care quality often lead to change in the primary endpoint, offer unintentional results in hospitals, and demand for more efforts in delivering excellence. There exist several agencies and organizations that regulate the delivery of care in hospitals. One of these agencies is the National Quality Forum, a non-profit organization that supports patient safety and protection by promoting high-quality care delivery. Under the direction of the federal government, this organization plays a vital function in creating a national quality strategy. It is also best recognized for its efforts in the United States in holding hospitals responsible for patient injuries and related incidences. Another organization is the Joint Commission, which also sets standards that guide in the provision of care services in the United States. This organ similarly appraises processes that support healthcare facilities in measuring, weighing, and increasing their performance levels. Its standards often focus on the patient, resident care, and administrative functions that remain essential to providing safe and high-grade care.

            Another organization is the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), also tasked with the responsibility of ensuring quality in the delivery of care in America (Year, 2013). It focuses on many areas, such as patient care, quality delivery, and healthcare settings, among others. Its mission is to give evidence to allow hospitals to offer safe, quality, and accessible care. It also provides guides on how to keep patients safe and increase nurse-patient quality. Besides, it also helps in developing data that aids to trace changes in the healthcare system in the country. These three agencies play central roles in America in measuring quality and ensuring patient safety across all healthcare organizations. For instance, each provides considerable standards for hospitals to use and adhere to as they serve patients. Over the past two decades, the healthcare quality setting in the United States has significantly changed.

Selected Risk Management Plan’s Compliance with MIPPA

Also known as the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act, the MIPPA regulates the delivery of patient quality in America. This body also outlines several standards, laws, and regulations that healthcare facilities must follow to ensure top-notch care services to patients. In this with this Act, the above-chosen risk management plan would seek to specify qualified and non-physician staff, duties and qualifications of medical personnel, and ensure the safety of all staff as well as patients in the hospital. This plan would also specify the procedures and methods necessary for ensuring consistency, simplicity, and technical quality of diagnostic processes. Besides, MIPPA also requires that means to help patients in getting imaging and other care records must exist. In this sense, the plan will ensure that such practices are in place. Equally, MIPPA similarly demands that imaging areas have a way of notifying the management of any changes in diagnostic modalities. In this sense, the plan will likewise ensure that it meets this requirement to comply with MIPPA.

Proposed Recommendations or Changes in the Plan

In attempts to ensure that the hospital maintains high-quality as well as complies with set standards, this plan would integrate all the guidelines established in MIPPA and other care regulatory agencies, including AHRQ and the Joint Commission. The plan would also include feedbacks from patients and employees to inform improved care and patient services throughout the hospital’s departments. The management would also be encouraged to become system thinkers to help the hospital meet its objectives in addressing safety issues and emerging risks (Kuhn & Youngberg, 2002).

References

Cagliano, A. C., Grimaldi, S., & Rafele, C. (2011). A systemic methodology for risk management in healthcare sector. Safety Science, 49(5), 695-708.

Kuhn, A. M., & Youngberg, B. J. (2002). The need for risk management to evolve to assure a culture of safety. BMJ Quality & Safety, 11(2), 158-162.

Year, F. (2013). Agency for healthcare research and quality. World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). 10 facts on patient safety. (2019, September 3). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/patient_safety/en/