This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecord the required information in each area of the Practicum Experience Plan (PEP):Part 1: Quarter/Term/Year and Contact Information: ᵒ Identify Quarter/Term/Year:ᵒ Identify Student Contact Information, including: Name, Street Address, City, State, Zip, Home Phone, Work Phone, Cell Phone, Fax, and Walden University Email ᵒ Identify Preceptor Contact Information, including: Name, Organization, Street Address, City, State, Zip, Work Phone, Cell Phone, Fax, and Professional/Work Email.
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly identifies the Quarter/Term/Year, all Student Contact Information, and all Preceptor Contact Information.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
The response identifies the Quarter/Term/Year, and at least 90% of Student Contact Information and Preceptor Contact Information.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
The response identifies the Quarter/Term/Year, and at least 80% of Student Contact Information and Preceptor Contact Information.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing identification of the Quarter/Term/Year and/or identifies less than 80% of Student Contact Information and Preceptor Contact Information.
|
|
5 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Individualized Practicum Learning Objectives: Explain three Individualized Practicum Learning Objectives that address your self-assessment of the skills found in the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment, are SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-focused, Time-focused), and meet the requirements for this course. Each Practicum Learning Objective must describe planned activities, mode of assessment, and PRAC course outcome(s) addressed for the skills you would like to improve from your self-assessment. Select one nursing theory and one counseling/psychotherapy theory to best guide your clinical practice, explaining these 2 chosen theories with supporting evidenced-based literature.
|
75 to >68.0 pts
Excellent
The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains three (3) Individualized Practicum Learning Objectives that address the self-assessment of the skills found in the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment, are SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-focused, Time-focused), and meet the requirements for this course. … For each Learning Objective, the response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly describes planned activities, mode of assessment, and PRAC course outcome(s) addressed for the skills to be improved from the self-assessment. … Clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains 2 chosen theories (1 nursing and 1 counseling/psychotherapy) to guide clinical practice with supporting literature.
|
68 to >59.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains three (3) Individualized Practicum Learning Objectives that address the self-assessment of the skills found in the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment, are SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-focused, Time-focused), and meet the requirements for this course. … For each Learning Objective, the response accurately describes planned activities, mode of assessment, and PRAC course outcome(s) addressed for the skills to be improved from the self-assessment. … Response accurately but briefly explains 2 chosen theories (1 nursing and 1 counseling/psychotherapy) to guide clinical practice with supporting literature.
|
59 to >52.0 pts
Fair
The response somewhat vaguely explains three (3) Individualized Practicum Learning Objectives that address the self-assessment of the skills found in the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment, are SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-focused, Time-focused), and meet the requirements for this course. … For each Learning Objective, the response somewhat vaguely describes planned activities, mode of assessment, and PRAC course outcome(s) addressed for the skills to be improved from the self-assessment. … Response vaguely explains 2 chosen theories (1 nursing and 1 counseling/psychotherapy) or one theory is missing in discussion to guide clinical practice with supporting literature.
|
52 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately or incompletely explains three (3) Individualized Practicum Learning Objectives that address the self-assessment of the skills found in the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment, are SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-focused, Time-focused), and meet the requirements for this course. … For each Learning Objective, the response has a vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete or missing description of planned activities, mode of assessment, and PRAC course outcome(s) addressed for the skills to be improved from the self-assessment. … Response inaccurately or incompletely explains 2 chosen theories (1 nursing and 1 counseling/psychotherapy) or no theories are discussed to guide clinical practice with supporting literature.
|
|
75 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Projected Timeline/Schedule: Describe your Practicum timeline/schedule, including: ᵒ Number of weekly hours projected to work on your Practicum ᵒ Number of weekly hours for Professional Development
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
The response includes a clear, accurate, and thorough description of the Practicum timeline/schedule, including number of weekly hours projected to work on the Practicum and number of weekly hours for Professional Development.
|
13 to >11.0 pts
Good
The response includes an accurate description of the Practicum timeline/schedule, including number of weekly hours projected to work on the Practicum and number of weekly hours for Professional Development.
|
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague description of the Practicum timeline/schedule, and may be missing details about the number of weekly hours projected to work on the Practicum or number of weekly hours for Professional Development.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes a vague, incomplete, and/or inaccurate or missing description of the Practicum timeline/schedule, including number of weekly hours projected to work on the Practicum, number of weekly hours for Professional Development.
|
|
15 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
