This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on your practice test question results and considering the national certification exam, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.
|
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.
|
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.
|
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.
|
17 to >0 pts
Poor
A summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a study plan, including three or four SMART goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.
|
30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response provides three or four clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.
|
26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response provides three or four appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided.
|
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response provides three or four somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.
|
20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides three or four unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing.
|
|
30 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.
|
30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.
|
26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.
|
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.
|
20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.
|
|
30 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.
|
|
5 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
|
|
5 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains one or two APA format errors
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
