5 8 John Hires Expert Examination Expert Discovers Summons Complaint D Deletions Without Q30727473 https://assignmenthandlers.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/logo1-300x75.png 0 0 AssignmentHandlers https://assignmenthandlers.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/logo1-300x75.png AssignmentHandlers2021-06-27 23:03:082021-06-27 23:03:085 8 John Hires Expert Examination Expert Discovers Summons Complaint D Deletions Without Q30727473
![. During the 5. (8] John hires an expert an examination, the expert discovers that with the summons and complaint d the deletions, and without the wou result of Marys spoliation of evidence? nplaictsary deleted videos of John after Mary had been served tIMary did so because she thought nobody would find out about to perform an examination of Marys smartphone id so because eos, John would lose his case). What can happen to Mary as a A. Mary can be imprisoned. be entered against Mary in Johns favor as a sanction. The judge could order M A, B, and C. B and C. ary to pay Johns attorney fees D. E. 6. (5] After engaging in about this situation? discovery, John files a motion for summary judgment. What can be said ing so, John is arguing that there are no disputed issues of fact (and n of the law to the facts means he is A. By do therefore no need for a trial), and applicatio entitled to judgment against Mary. Mary may defeat the motion if she can establish a genuine issue of material fact (ie, if she can establish a dispute over a fact that can affect the outcome of the case). The motion will less likely be granted in a New Mexico state trial court than a federal trial court. A, B, and C. The court cannot grant a motion for summary judgment if either John or Mary requested a jury trial 8. C. D. E. 7. (1 Fred from ge ] John and Mary are going to trial. During jury selection, Marys attorney seeks to exclude the jury because Fred is a white male, and Marys attorney thinks that, based on his nder and race, Fred will be sympathetic to John who is also a white male. The challenge by Marys attorney is a peremptory challenge and is valid. A. B. The challenge by Marys attorney is a challenge for cause and is valid. The challenge by Marys attorney is a peremptory challenge and is invalid. The challenge by Marys attorney is a challenge for cause and is invalid. D. E. The challenge by Marys attorney is an en banc challenge a Fred is in a protected class (such as over 40 years of age). nd is thus invalid unless](https://media.cheggcdn.com/media%2F235%2F235b7f33-3097-4295-94b4-2b53ae9f618b%2Fimage)
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!