NR529 Module 1 Collaboration cafe and Reflection 2 question and answer

Chamberlain University Collaboration Café Rubric Collaboration Café Guidelines and Grading Rubric Purpose In specific weeks of the course, you will have the opportunity to collaborate with your classmates in the Collaboration Café for a graded assignment. The point value of the weekly assignment can be worth either 30 or 50 points, and the point value will be identified on each assignment. The Collaboration Café is an interactive process among the students. Faculty participation will be minimal; however, faculty will monitor this section for compliance and clarification. Due Date • The suggested due date for the primary and responsive postings is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of the week that corresponds with the module (e.g., Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 2 for the Collaboration Café in Module 2). • All Collaboration Cafés must be submitted by Monday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Module 8 with the exception of the Module 8 Collaboration Café. The due date for Module 8 is Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Total Points Possible: 50 points (30 points for some instances) Requirements In the graded Collaboration Café, students are expected to post their initial response and then interact with at least two different classmates during that module for a total of three postings per Collaboration Café worth 50 points, and two postings per Collaboration Café worth 30 points. MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022 Chamberlain University Collaboration Café Rubric Scholarly references are not required in the Collaboration Café discussions; however, if the student chooses to submit a reference, APA format must be followed. There may also be times when faculty will have you review a website or article. In cases like these, you must properly cite and reference according to APA to avoid plagiarism. In addition, proper grammar is expected. Faculty may submit the discussion to Turnitin in order to verify originality of work. Plagiarism will result in a zero for the week. Uncivil comments toward peers or faculty, in any of the posts, will not be tolerated and will result in a zero for the week. A substantive post will include the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner • Demonstrates application of course concepts • Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice • Responds to classmates with an extended description instead of merely agreeing GRADING RUBRIC Category Points % Description Discussion content • 25 (12)* 25% Response to peers 15 (8)* 15% MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022 • • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Demonstrates application of course concepts Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice • • • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Chamberlain University APA, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organizational flow Collaboration Café Rubric 5 5% Participation requirement 5 Total 50 (30)* 5% 100% • APA, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organizational flow of the content reflects professional standards • • Primary posting in response to the questions posed is present Minimum of two responsive posts to peers. When the Collaboration Café is worth 30 points, only one responsive post to a peer is required. A quality assignment will meet all of the above requirements. *A score in parenthesis represents the 30 point scale. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Outstanding level of performance 100% Satisfactory level of performance 86% Deficient level of performance 68% Unsatisfactory level of performance 0% 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 25 12 22 10 17 8 0 Discussion content Presentation of information includes all of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Presentation of information includes two of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022 Presentation of information includes one of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Presentation of information includes none of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Chamberlain University • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area Collaboration Café Rubric • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 15 8 13 7 8 5 0 Response to peers Presentation of information includes all of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Presentation of information includes at least two of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Presentation of information includes at least one of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Presentation of information includes none of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 5 4 3 0 APA, grammar, and syntax There are no errors in the posts. There are 1-2 errors in the posts. There are 3-4 errors in the posts. There are 5 or more errors in the posts. MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022 Chamberlain University 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 5 Student answers the question or topic on one day and interacts with at least two other classmates in a particular module for the week. In the 30-point rubric, the student interacts with at least one other classmate in a particular module for the week. MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022 Collaboration Café Rubric 0 Student did not meet this requirement. Module Reflective Discussion Guidelines and Rubric PURPOSE The purpose of this reflective discussion is to encourage student reflection upon concepts learned during the module and their contribution to professional growth. Students will reflect upon learning within each module and connect insights gained with course-specific outcomes. DUE DATE • • Reflection 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday during Modules 1–8 of the session. Reflection 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Modules 1–7 of the session and due 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday at the end of Module 8 of the session. TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 15 POINTS REFLECTION OVERVIEW This course includes eight weekly modules of content. During each of the eight modules within this course session, please respond to the following reflective questions, beginning with Module 1 (the first week of the session) and continuing in consecutive order throughout the eight modules of the course session. For each module, consider the course concepts and topics addressed during the respective module, and respond to the following questions. Reflection 1: Review the course outcomes and consider the module objectives. What do you hope to learn during this module of study? Reflection 2: Based on your response to Reflection 1, state one insight that you gained regarding the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed during this module. MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 1 REFLECTION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy. 2. Read the two reflective questions and respond within the following timeframes noted above. 3. Follow the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph structures. 4. The use of first person tense is acceptable in the reflective discussions. REFLECTION CRITERIA Category Points % Description Reflection 1 6 40% Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student hopes to learn during this module. Reflection 2 6 40% Reflective posting is submitted and • describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module; and • connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. Timeliness of Postings 3 20% During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. AND During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. OR During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. Graduatelevel Writing Style It is an expectation that graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct: • Grammar • Spelling • Word usage • Punctuation • Sentence structure • Paragraph structure If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted. MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 2 Total 15 100% A quality reflective discussion will meet or exceed all the above requirements. GRADING RUBRIC Reflection Criteria Met Not Met Reflection 1 6 Points 0 Points Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student hopes to learn during this module. Reflective posting is submitted but fails to clearly describe what the student hopes to learn during this module. OR No posting is submitted in response to Reflection 1. Reflection 2 6 Points 0 Points Reflective posting is submitted and • describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module; and • connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. Reflective posting is submitted but fails to meet one or both of the following criteria. • Describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module. • Connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. OR No posting is submitted in response to Reflection 2. Timeliness of Postings 3 Points 0 Points The following expectations for timely postings are met: One or more of the following expectations for timely postings are not met: During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. AND MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 3 AND During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. OR OR During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. Graduatelevel Writing Style During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. 0 Points Deducted Graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct: • Grammar • Spelling • Word usage • Punctuation • Sentence structure • Paragraph structure MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 3 Points Deducted One or more errors is present in any of the following areas. • • • • • • Grammar Spelling Word usage Punctuation Sentence structure Paragraph structure 4 NR529 Module 1: Collaboration Café (graded) Due: 10/29 Imagine a case scenario where you are the nurse leader for a clinical healthcare environment of your choosing. As the nurse leader, you have been asked to determine the best patient care delivery model to use on the unit. Consider this situation and respond to the following. What two patient care delivery models could be considered for use within the clinical healthcare environment you identified? Describe how each model would support safe, high-quality, person-centered care. • What decision-making model would you apply to facilitate selection of the model best suited for the environment, and what steps would you take to apply the model? • What leadership competencies will be needed to implement the new model? • As you respond to peers, consider the similarities and differences between the models presented.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100  

 

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now