NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Collaboration Cafe Paper

NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Collaboration Cafe Paper

Module Reflective Discussion Guidelines and Rubric PURPOSE The purpose of this reflective discussion is to encourage student reflection upon concepts learned during the module and their contribution to professional growth. Students will reflect upon learning within each module and connect insights gained with course-specific outcomes. DUE DATE • • Reflection 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday during Modules 1–8 of the session. Reflection 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Modules 1–7 of the session and due 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday at the end of Module 8 of the session. TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 15 POINTS REFLECTION OVERVIEW This course includes eight weekly modules of content. During each of the eight modules within this course session, please respond to the following reflective questions, beginning with Module 1 (the first week of the session) and continuing in consecutive order throughout the eight modules of the course session. For each module, consider the course concepts and topics addressed during the respective module, and respond to the following questions. Reflection 1: Review the course outcomes and consider the module objectives. What do you hope to learn during this module of study? Reflection 2: Based on your response to Reflection 1, state one insight that you gained regarding the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed during this module. MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 1 REFLECTION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy. 2. Read the two reflective questions and respond within the following timeframes noted above. 3. Follow the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph structures. 4. The use of first person tense is acceptable in the reflective discussions. REFLECTION CRITERIA Category Points % Description Reflection 1 6 40% Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student hopes to learn during this module. Reflection 2 6 40% Reflective posting is submitted and • describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module; and • connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. Timeliness of Postings 3 20% During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. AND During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. OR During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. Graduatelevel Writing Style It is an expectation that graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct: • Grammar • Spelling • Word usage • Punctuation • Sentence structure • Paragraph structure If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted. MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 2 Total 15 100% A quality reflective discussion will meet or exceed all the above requirements. GRADING RUBRIC Reflection Criteria Met Not Met Reflection 1 6 Points 0 Points Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student hopes to learn during this module. Reflective posting is submitted but fails to clearly describe what the student hopes to learn during this module. OR No posting is submitted in response to Reflection 1. Reflection 2 6 Points 0 Points Reflective posting is submitted and • describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module; and • connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. Reflective posting is submitted but fails to meet one or both of the following criteria. • Describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module. • Connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. OR No posting is submitted in response to Reflection 2. Timeliness of Postings 3 Points 0 Points The following expectations for timely postings are met: One or more of the following expectations for timely postings are not met: During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. AND MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 3 AND During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. OR OR During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. Graduatelevel Writing Style During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. 0 Points Deducted Graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct: • Grammar • Spelling • Word usage • Punctuation • Sentence structure • Paragraph structure MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 3 Points Deducted One or more errors is present in any of the following areas. • • • • • • Grammar Spelling Word usage Punctuation Sentence structure Paragraph structure 4 Chamberlain University Collaboration Café Rubric Collaboration Café Guidelines and Grading Rubric Purpose In specific weeks of the course, you will have the opportunity to collaborate with your classmates in the Collaboration Café for a graded assignment. The point value of the weekly assignment can be worth either 30 or 50 points, and the point value will be identified on each assignment. The Collaboration Café is an interactive process among the students. Faculty participation will be minimal; however, faculty will monitor this section for compliance and clarification. Due Date • The suggested due date for the primary and responsive postings is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of the week that corresponds with the module (e.g., Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 2 for the Collaboration Café in Module 2). • All Collaboration Cafés must be submitted by Monday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Module 8 with the exception of the Module 8 Collaboration Café. The due date for Module 8 is Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Total Points Possible: 50 points (30 points for some instances) Requirements In the graded Collaboration Café, students are expected to post their initial response and then interact with at least two different classmates during that module for a total of three postings per Collaboration Café worth 50 points, and two postings per Collaboration Café worth 30 points. MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022 Chamberlain University Collaboration Café Rubric Scholarly references are not required in the Collaboration Café discussions; however, if the student chooses to submit a reference, APA format must be followed. There may also be times when faculty will have you review a website or article. In cases like these, you must properly cite and reference according to APA to avoid plagiarism. In addition, proper grammar is expected. Faculty may submit the discussion to Turnitin in order to verify originality of work. Plagiarism will result in a zero for the week. Uncivil comments toward peers or faculty, in any of the posts, will not be tolerated and will result in a zero for the week. A substantive post will include the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner • Demonstrates application of course concepts • Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice • Responds to classmates with an extended description instead of merely agreeing GRADING RUBRIC Category Points % Description Discussion content • 25 (12)* 25% Response to peers 15 (8)* 15% MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022 • • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Demonstrates application of course concepts Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice • • • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Chamberlain University APA, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organizational flow Collaboration Café Rubric 5 5% Participation requirement 5 Total 50 (30)* 5% 100% • APA, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organizational flow of the content reflects professional standards • • Primary posting in response to the questions posed is present Minimum of two responsive posts to peers. When the Collaboration Café is worth 30 points, only one responsive post to a peer is required. A quality assignment will meet all of the above requirements. *A score in parenthesis represents the 30 point scale. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Outstanding level of performance 100% Satisfactory level of performance 86% Deficient level of performance 68% Unsatisfactory level of performance 0% 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 25 12 22 10 17 8 0 Discussion content Presentation of information includes all of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Presentation of information includes two of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022 Presentation of information includes one of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Presentation of information includes none of the following. • Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner Chamberlain University • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area Collaboration Café Rubric • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area • • Explains opinion thoroughly about the required topic Applies the concepts of the topic to a specific practice area 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 15 8 13 7 8 5 0 Response to peers Presentation of information includes all of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Presentation of information includes at least two of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Presentation of information includes at least one of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner Presentation of information includes none of the following. • Includes substantive content that poses new ideas • Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue • Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 5 4 3 0 APA, grammar, and syntax There are no errors in the posts. There are 1-2 errors in the posts. There are 3-4 errors in the posts. There are 5 or more errors in the posts. MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022 Chamberlain University 50-Point Scale 30-Point Scale 5 Student answers the question or topic on one day and interacts with at least two other classmates in a particular module for the week. In the 30-point rubric, the student interacts with at least one other classmate in a particular module for the week. MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022 Collaboration Café Rubric 0 Student did not meet this requirement. NR528 Module 5: Collaboration Café (graded) DUE 11/26/2022 Perform a mini SWOT analysis on the organization where you are planning your change project. How does the SWOT analysis set the stage for strategic planning, especially in regards to change? Make sure to place your mini SWOT here in the Collaboration Café space. NR528 Module 5: Reflection: Part 2 (graded) DUE 11/26/2022 Based on your response to Reflection: Part 1, state one insight that you gained regarding the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed during this module. Course Outcomes CO 2: Determine the need for planned change that improves health and organizational outcomes based on a comprehensive needs assessment. (POs 4 and 5) • CO 3: Create a plan to lead and evaluate an evidence-informed change initiative in order to promote practice-related outcomes. (POs 4 and 5) • Module Objectives Examine the value of the strategic planning process to organizations. (COs 2 and 3) • Discuss the SWOT analysis in the strategic planning process. (COs 2 and 3) • Explore how the strategic planning process can assist with implementing QI and EBP change initiatives. (COs 2 and 3) • THIS IS WHAT I POSTED IN PART 1 In this module, I hope to learn: • • How to determine the need for planned change that improves health and organizational outcomes based on a comprehensive needs assessment. How to create a plan to lead and evaluate an evidence-informed change initiative in order to promote practice-related outcomes. NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING Module 4 Assignment: Literature Matrix and Synthesis Guidelines and Rubric DUE 11/19/2022 PURPOSE As a master’s-prepared advance practice nurse you will have many opportunities to lead evidence-based change in practice. The deliverable at the end of this program is a completed evidence-based process improvement project prepared for dissemination. The beginning steps of developing an evidence-based practice improvement project include creating a clinical or practice question and searching literature. The purpose of this assessment is to use the clinical or practice question developed in NR520 and conduct a literature search for articles that answer and/or explain the clinical or practice question. Students will conduct a literature search in relevant databases and complete a literature matrix table. Students will also provide a short summary synthesizing their evidence. COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes: • • • CO 1: Apply leadership and management theories, concepts, and models as a foundation for planned change within healthcare delivery settings. (PO 4,5) CO 2: Determine the need for planned change that improves health and organizational outcomes based on a comprehensive needs assessment (PO 4,5) CO 3: Create a plan to lead and evaluate an evidence-informed change initiative in order to promote practice-related outcomes (PO 4,5) SUGGESTED DUE DATE This assignment has a suggested due date of Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 4. Final due date is Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 7. NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 180 POINTS ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW For this assignment, students will use the clinical or practice question developed in NR520 and conduct a literature search for articles that answer and/or explain the clinical or practice question. Students will conduct a literature search in relevant databases and complete a literature matrix table. Students will also provide a short summary synthesizing their evidence. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS 1. Review clinical/practice question developed in NR520. You might choose to modify or change the clinical/practice question. 2. Conduct a literature search in databases appropriate for the identified clinical/practice question. 3. Select ten (10) scholarly articles published within the past five years. 4. Complete the Literature Matrix Table 5. In a summary, synthesize your findings from the reviewed evidence and include in Part II of the Literature Matrix. 6. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy. 7. Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor. 8. Written portions of this assignment must use appropriate citation of sources, and references must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. 9. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (current edition). 10. Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can resubmit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper, rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59pm. (You cannot revise your APA for a higher grade in that category) ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA Assessment Criteria Part I of the Literature Matrix Table Points % 85 47 Description Complete the Literature Matrix Table. All columns are completed. Ten (10) articles are provided. Articles selected address or answer the clinical/practice question. Articles selected are scholarly and published within the past five years. NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING Part II Synthesis of Evidence 85 47 Summary and synthesis of findings is included on the form addressing how the articles answered the EBP question. Graduate-level Writing Style 10 6 • • • • • Total 180 100% Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING GRADING RUBRIC Assessment Criteria Part I of the Literature Matrix Table Distinguished Exceeds Proficient Needs Improvement (100%) (92%) (84%) (0) 85 Points 78 Points 71 Points 0 Points Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • Completes all columns of the Literature Matrix Table • Provides ten (10) articles • Articles are scholarly and published within the past five years • Articles address or answer clinical/practice question Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • Completes all columns of the Literature Matrix Table • Provides ten (10) articles • Articles are scholarly and published within the past five years • Articles address or answer clinical/practice question Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: • Completes all columns of the Literature Matrix Table • Provides ten (10) articles • Articles are scholarly and published within the past five years • Articles address or answer clinical/practice question Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • Completes all columns of the Literature Matrix Table • Provides ten (10) articles • Articles are scholarly and published within the past five years • Articles address or answer clinical/practice question 4 NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING Part II Synthesis of Evidence Graduatelevel Writing Style 85 Points 78 Points 71 Points 0 Points Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • Assesses and assimilates consistencies in findings • At least two-three paragraphs of information is presented • Addresses how articles answered the EBP question. • Synthesis is thorough and presented in at least two-three paragraphs. Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • Assesses and assimilates consistencies in findings • At least two-three paragraphs of information is presented • Addresses how articles answered the EBP question. • Synthesis is thorough and presented in at least two-three paragraphs. Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: • Assesses and assimilates consistencies in findings • At least two-three paragraphs of information is presented • Addresses how articles answered the EBP question. • Synthesis is thorough and presented in at least two-three paragraphs. Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • Assesses and assimilates consistencies in findings • At least two-three paragraphs of information is presented • Addresses how articles answered the EBP question. • Synthesis is thorough and presented in at least two-three paragraphs. 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 0 Points Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the 5 NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) following criteria with 2-4 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) criteria with 5-7 errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) following criteria with 8 or more errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) 6 NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING 7