Global finance, inc. (gfi) | Computer Science homework help
GLOBAL FINANCE, INC. (GFI)
Global Finance, Inc. (GFI) is a financial company that manages thousands of accounts across Canada, the United States, and Mexico. A public company traded on the NYSE, GFI specializes in financial management, loan application approval, wholesale loan processing, and investment of money management for their customers.
The diagram below displays the executive management team of GFI:
CEO
John Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assistant |
|
|
|
|
|
Trey Elway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
|
|
Assistant |
|
|
|
|
|
Assistant |
|
|
|
|
Julie Anderson |
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle Wang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCO |
|
COO |
|
CFO |
Director of |
|
Director of HR |
|||
|
|
|
|
Marketing |
|
|||||
Andy Murphy |
|
Mike Willy |
|
Ron Johnson |
|
|
|
Ted Young |
||
|
|
|
|
John King |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1 GFI Executive Organizational Chart
BACKGROUND AND YOUR ROLE
You are the Chief Security Officer, hired by COO Mike Willy, to protect the physical and operational security of GFI’s corporate information systems. Shortly after starting in your new position, you recognize numerous challenges that you will be facing in this pursuit.
Your primary challenge, as is usually the case, is less technical and more of a political nature. CEO John Thompson has been swept up in the “everything can be solved by outsourcing” movement. He believes that the IT problem is a known quantity and feels the IT function can be almost entirely outsourced at fractions of the cost associated with creating and maintaining an established internal IT department. In fact, the CEO’s strategy has been to prevent IT from becoming a core competency since so many services can be obtained from 3rd parties. Based on this vision, the CEO has already begun downsizing the IT department and recently presented a proposal to his senior management team outlining his plan to greatly reduce the internal IT staff in favor of outsourcing. He plans on presenting this approach to the Board of Directors as soon as he has made a few more refinements in his presentation.
COO Willy’s act of hiring you was, in fact, an act of desperation: the increasing operational dependence on technology services combined with a diminishing IT footprint gravely concerned Mike Willy, and he begged to at least bring in an Information Security expert with the experience necessary to evaluate the current security of GFI’s infrastructure and systems. The COO’s worst nightmare is a situation where the Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability of GFI’s information systems were compromised – bringing the company to its knees – then having to rely on vendors to pull him out of the mess.
COO Willy has reasons for worrying. GFI has experienced several cyber-attacks from outsiders over the past a few years:
• In 2013, the Oracle database server was attacked and its customer database lost its confidentiality, integrity, and availability for several days. Although the company restored the Oracle database server back online, its lost confidentiality damaged the company reputation. GFI ended up paying its customers a large sum of settlement for their loss of data confidentiality.
• In 2014, another security attack was carried out by a malicious virus that infected the entire
• In a separate incident in 2014, one of the financial consultants left his company laptop unprotected at the airport while travelling and it was stolen. It contained customer financial data and the hard drive was not encrypted. Financial reparations were paid to impacted customers.
• In 2015, a laptop running network sniffer software was found plugged into a network jack under a desk in one of the unoccupied offices.
It is apparent from the number of successful cyber-attacks that GFI is an organization severely lacking in information security maturity. COO Willy has commissioned you to perform a quantitative and qualitative risk assessment of GFI’s infrastructure to determine where improvements could be made to reduce the risk of future attacks.
CORPORATE OFFICE NETWORK TOPOLOGY
The diagram on the following page displays GFI’s Corporate Office Topology.
The GFI network infrastructure consists of a corporate WAN spanning 10 remote facilities that are interconnected to the GFI headquarters’ central data processing environment. Data is transmitted from a remote site through a VPN gateway appliance that forms a VPN tunnel with the VPN gateway in headquarters. Through this VPN connection, remote office users access the internal Oracle database to update the customer data tables. Through your inspection of the VPN configuration you discover that the data transaction traversing the remote access connection to the corporate internal databases is not encrypted.
Users are authorized to work from home and both dial-up and VPN remote access are available. Dial-up is provided via Private Branch Exchange (PBX) and a Remote Access Server and VPN remote access is provided via the VPN gateway. Authentication is password-based via MS-CHAP V2. Users are also able to take advantage of GFI’s Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policy and a Wireless antenna allows wireless networking within headquarters. WEP is used to provide wireless security to BYOD users.
The network perimeter between the Internet and GFI’s internal network infrastructure is separated by two Border (Core) Routers. These Border Routers then connect to two Distribution Routers and the VPN Gateway. The Distribution Routers connect to a RAS Server, a Wireless Router that provides a bridge between the Wireless Antenna and the internal network, and two Multi-layer switches. The Multilayer switches connect to six (6) Access Layer VLAN switches that segregate the Accounting, Loan Dept, Customer Services, Mgmt, Credit Dept, and Finance VLANs. The Multi-layer switches also connect to a third Multi-layer switch that provides a connection to GFI’s servers in the Trusted Computing Base subnet.
The trusted computing based (TCB) internal network is situated in a physically separated subnet. A bulk of the data processing for GFI is handled by an Oracle database on a high end super computer located in the TCB and the TCB also contains an intranet web server used by the internal support team, a Software Update Services (SUS) server used for patch management, an internal DNS server, an e-mail server, and other support personnel workstations. Although each corporate department is segregated physically on a different subnet, they share access to the corporate data in the TCB network.
90
Wireless 90
Antenn9a0
NOTE: The symbol represents a multilayer switch
CONSIDERATIONS WHEN CONDUCTING THE RISK ASSESSMENT:
This Risk Assessment and your suggested security improvements are of critical importance. CEO Thompson is set on outsourcing GFI’s IT competency and you’ve been told of a plan from COO Willy to outsource network management and security functions away from your department and over to a service integrator. COO Willy warns you that the political environment will only become more contentious over time; you must make a compelling case as to what value your department can bring over an integrator to provide security improvements in certain key areas without a significant increase to the IT budget. It is extremely important that you take into account the value of the assets being protected when selecting security controls to mitigate the risks (i.e. don’t spend $ 1000 to protect an asset worth $500). In addition to what you learned from COO Mike Willy about the previous exploits of GFI’s vulnerabilities and what you gathered when reviewing GFI’s network infrastructure, the COO has provided some additional information that he wants you to take into account:
1. Ever since an article ran in Fortune about GFI, the network engineers report that they’ve noted a significant spike in network traffic crossing into the internal networks. They report that they cannot be certain what or who is generating this traffic, but the volume and frequency of traffic is certainly abnormal. The management is very concerned over securing the corporate confidential data and customer information. Suggestions on improvements to perimeter security and/or methods of identifying the source of intrusions should be presented in your risk assessment.
2. The interrelationship between data and operations concerns COO Mike Willy. Increasingly, some of the ten (10) remote sites have been reporting significant problems with network latency, slow performance, and application time-outs against the Oracle database. The company’s business model is driving higher and higher demand for data, but your capability to respond to these problems are drastically limited. Suggestions on reducing network latency or increasing application response time and availability should be presented in your risk assessment.
3. Mobility is important for the organization to interact with the customers and other co-workers in near real-time. However, the COO is concerned with mobility security and would like you to research best practices for mobile computing. Security within the BYOD environment should be presented in your risk assessment.
4. Employees enjoy the flexibility of getting access to the corporate network using a WiFi network. However, the COO is concerned over the security ramifications over the wireless network that is widely open to the company and nearby residents. Security within the wireless environment should be presented in your risk assessment.
5. The company plans to offer its products and services online and requested its IT department to design a Cloud Computing based e-commerce platform. However, the COO is particularly concerned over the cloud computing security in case the customer database is breached.
ASSIGNMENTS
• From the devices and systems identified in the GFI Corporate Network Topology, conduct a thorough asset inventory, assign monetary values to each asset (quantitative), and assign a priority value for each asset (qualitative) that could be used to determine which assets are most critical for restoral in the event of a catastrophic event or attack.
• Evaluate the perimeter security, make a list of access points internal and external (remote), identify vulnerabilities and make suggestions for improvements to perimeter and network security.
• Evaluate the remote access infrastructure, identify vulnerabilities and suggest security improvements to mitigate risks to remote access.
• Address the COO’s concern over the mobility security and design a secure mobile computing
(smart phones, tablets, laptops, etc.) in terms of authentication technologies and data protection.
• Identify wireless vulnerabilities and recommend what safeguards, authentication technologies, and network security to protect data should be implemented.
• Evaluate the authentication protocols and methodologies within the wired, wireless, mobility and remote access environments and suggest improvements to secure authentication for GFI.
• Evaluate the web system protocols and vulnerabilities within the Intranet server and suggest secure protocol improvements to improve security for web authentication.
• Design a cloud computing environment for the company with a secure means of data protection at rest, in motion and in process.
• Assess all known vulnerabilities on each asset in this environment and impacts if compromised.
• Using the asset inventory and the assigned values (monetary and priority) conduct a quantitative and qualitative risk assessment of the GFI network.
• Recommend risk mitigation procedures commensurate with the asset values from your asset inventory. Feel free to redesign the corporate infrastructure and use any combination of technologies to harden the authentication processes and network security measures.
• Provide an Executive Summary.
• You are welcome to make assumptions for any unknown facts as long as you support your assumptions.
• The Title Page, Table of Contents and References page(s) don’t count in your 15 page minimum!!!
Risk Assessment Paper Rubric
You are given a fictional scenario above describing security issues affecting organizational assets. You will identify the risks associated with the assets, and recommend mitigating procedures. You will prepare a quantitative / qualitative risk assessment to address risk factors on organizational assets. Your final paper will be 15–25 pageslong in a Word document (double -spaced with 12 point font) with APA citations for the resources you used in your research and will be graded using the following rubric.
Criteria |
Non-compliant |
Minimal |
Compliant |
Advanced |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory assets |
Did not inventory or |
Inventoried assets but |
Inventoried, prioritized |
Inventoried, prioritized |
and prioritize |
prioritize assets in |
did not prioritize them |
assets, but did not address |
assets and addressed |
them in the |
the order of mission |
in the order of |
mission objectives in |
mission objectives in their |
order of mission |
criticality. (0) |
mission criticality. (3) |
their asset priority. (6) |
asset priority. (10) |
criticality. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate |
Did not evaluate |
Evaluated enterprise |
Evaluated enterprise |
Evaluated enterprise |
enterprise |
enterprise topology |
topology but did not |
topology, perimeter |
topology, perimeter |
topology and |
and perimeter |
include perimeter |
protection measures, but |
protection measures, and |
perimeter |
protection. (0) |
protection measures. |
did not address mission |
addressed mission |
protection. |
|
(3) |
objectives. (6) |
objectives. . (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate remote |
Did not evaluate |
Evaluated remote |
Evaluated remote access |
Evaluated remote access |
access to the |
remote access |
access protocols but |
protocols, security |
protocols, security |
networks. |
protocols and |
did not address |
safeguards to the |
safeguards to the network, |
|
safeguards to the |
security safeguards to |
network, but did not |
and addressed mission |
|
network. (0) |
the network. (3) |
address mission |
objectives. (10) |
|
|
|
objectives. (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate |
Did not evaluate |
Evaluated |
Evaluated authentication |
Evaluated authentication |
authentication |
authentication |
authentication |
protocols, methodologies |
protocols, methodologies |
protocols and |
protocols and |
protocols, |
with supporting data and |
with supporting data, |
methodologies. |
methodologies. (0) |
methodologies but |
description, but lacks |
description; and addressed |
|
|
with insufficient data |
mission objectives. (6) |
mission objectives. (10) |
|
|
or inadequate |
|
|
|
|
description. (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assign asset |
Did not assign asset |
Assigned asset values |
Assigned asset values to |
Assigned asset values to |
values to |
values to |
to organization assets |
organization assets in a |
organization assets in a |
organization |
organization assets |
for quantitative / |
complete inventory, but |
complete inventory, and |
assets for |
for quantitative / |
qualitative risk |
did not address mission |
addressed mission |
quantitative / |
qualitative risk |
assessment but |
objectives. (6) |
objectives. (10) |
qualitative risk |
assessment. (0) |
incomplete. (3) |
|
|
assessment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assess |
Did not assess |
Assessed |
Assessed vulnerabilities |
Assessed vulnerabilities |
vulnerabilities |
vulnerabilities on |
vulnerabilities on |
on each asset and impacts |
on each asset and impacts |
on each asset |
each asset and |
each asset and |
if compromised; of |
if compromised; of |
and impacts if |
impacts if |
impacts if |
complete inventory but |
complete inventory and |
compromised. |
compromised. (0) |
compromised; but |
did not address mission |
addressed mission |
|
|
incomplete. (3) |
objectives. (6) |
objectives. (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate web |
Did not evaluate |
Evaluated web |
Evaluated web access |
Evaluated web access |
access protocols |
web access |
access protocols and |
protocols and |
protocols and |
and |
protocols and |
vulnerabilities or |
vulnerabilities and Cloud |
vulnerabilities and Cloud |
vulnerabilities |
vulnerabilities and |
Cloud Computing. |
Computing but did not |
Computing and |
and Cloud |
Cloud Computing |
(3) |
address mission |
addressed mission |
Computing |
(0) |
|
objectives. (6) |
objectives. (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compliant |
Minimal |
Compliant |
Advanced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommend risk |
Did not |
Recommended risk |
Recommended risk |
Recommended risk |
mitigation |
recommended risk |
mitigation procedures |
mitigation procedures |
mitigation procedures |
procedures |
mitigation |
commensurate with |
commensurate with asset |
commensurate with asset |
commensurate |
procedures |
asset values, but |
values of complete |
values of complete |
with asset values. |
commensurate with |
incomplete. (3) |
inventory, but did not |
inventory, and addressed |
|
asset values. (0) |
|
address mission |
mission objectives. (10) |
|
|
|
objectives. (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formulate 15-25 |
Did not follow |
Followed proper |
Followed proper |
Followed proper |
pages of a |
proper quantitative |
quantitative or |
quantitative or qualitative |
quantitative or qualitative |
quantitative or |
or qualitative risk |
qualitative risk |
risk assessment format |
risk assessment format and |
qualitative risk |
assessment format, |
assessment format but |
and conformed to APA |
conformed to APA in a |
assessment in |
and failed to |
did not conform to |
but insufficient reference |
sufficient reference list |
APA format. |
conform to APA |
APA format. (3) |
list and page count. (6) |
and page count. (10) |
|
format. (0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
Did not include an |
Included an executive |
Included an executive |
Included an executive |
summary of risk |
executive summary. |
summary but lacks |
summary in details, but |
summary in details, and |
assessment. |
(0) |
details. (3) |
did not address the |
addressed mission |
|
|
|
mission objectives. (6) |
objectives. (10) |
|
|
|
|
|